The treasury markets have been stuck in a sideways trading pattern since the Federal Reserve Board’s announcement that they would begin tapering off the additional stimulus with the intention of completing their stimulus additions by year end.
Gold, interest rates and the stock market have a very interesting relationship. Normally, declining interest rates are good for business and bad for gold. Post 9/11 and housing bubble, zero interest rate policies (ZIRP) created an artificial situation that fractured this relationship rendering it virtually useless over the last decade. This began to change last summer when the Federal Reserve Board stated that they would begin slowing the stimulus they’ve provided to the economy thus allowing interest rates to gradually rise. These relationships have begun to sort themselves out over the last three quarters and may actually be telling us something about the current pricing in the gold market.
There are times when the markets tell us more about what’s going on than the people on TV. I think this is one of those times. The recent rhetoric has been a political budget argument over nickels and dimes when we they need to be talking about hundreds and thousands. The political blame and spin game is being played at its highest level. The reality is that we are quickly approaching the end of the second round of quantitative easing. The government’s balance sheet reached a record level of $2.63 trillion as of April 7th. This is evidence that the fed has been putting their purchasing power to work. The $600 billion that was enacted to keep interest rates low, provide loans to new businesses and help the economy regain its footing after the financial meltdown of ’08 may be coming to an early end. The markets suggest that the Fed’s next meeting on April 26th could put a kink in the free flow of dollars coming to the market.
There are arguments on both sides of this fence from the insignificant periphery right down to the board of governors itself. The quantifiable portion of this argument is that the commercial traders clearly expect a slowdown in inflation and the economy in the near term. The consensus and conviction of the commercial traders’ positions can be seen in multiple markets; corn, oil, heating oil, copper, bonds, 10 year notes, S&P 500 and Dow Jones futures, etc. Their shift in positions can best be described as, “defensive.”
Copper is typically referred to as the, “economist” of the metals markets. Its use in building construction has always been a fair barometer of the economy’s growth and contraction. Commercial traders in copper from the commitment of traders report have shed nearly 40% of their positions since late February. The combination of China’s successive rate hikes and tightening lending practices paint a clear picture that their fully stocked warehouses are in no danger of depletion.
The crude oil market has seen consistent selling by commercial traders above $100 per barrel. Fear, due to the unrest in Northern Africa has been the primary driver of crude oil prices. This market has remained oblivious to the fact that the storage wells in Cushing, Oklahoma are bumping along near record levels. The price of gasoline has disconnected from the price of crude due to refining issues, not supply issues.
Interest rate futures have seen a flush of commercial buying. The 10 year Treasury Notes have seen commercial positions increase by more than 20% while the 30 year bonds have seen commercial traders increase their net position from 70, 000 contracts at the end of February to more than 120,000 contracts currently. Their buying of U.S. interest rate futures is part technical, and part predictive of a flight to safety driving down Treasury yields.
The flight to safety is predicted from commercial traders selling stock index futures. Commercial traders were buyers on the mid March stock market correction. However, their buying was light and their selling since has pushed their net momentum to negative levels. They may view the extended period of low volatility in the VIX index combined with testing the markets’ February highs as reasonable long liquidation levels or, low risk short selling opportunities.
This combination of moves is certainly bearish. I believe it is predicated by the theory that QE2 may be brought to an early end. If this is the case, the short term reaction would be a stronger U.S. Dollar. This would obviously be a short term negative for commodity markets in general like copper, oil, grains, cotton, etc. However, this would do nothing to alter the global change in demographics. There will be no fewer people to feed and this will not impact the growing global purchasing power that has fueled much of the commodity rally. Therefore, the macro trends will remain intact. This will simply force out many of the weaker hands that have been riding the coat tails of the rallies on the way up.
This blog is published by Andy Waldock. Andy Waldock is a trader, analyst, broker and asset manager. Therefore, Andy Waldock may have positions for himself, his family, or, his clients in any market discussed. The blog is meant for educational purposes and to develop a dialogue among those with an interest in the commodity markets. The commodity markets employ a high degree of leverage and may not be suitable for all investors. There is substantial risk of loss in investing in futures.