Follow the Market Makers – Not the Chasers


This year’s corn market provides a textbook example of the
accumulation and distribution of positions throughout a market’s trend as well
as identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the market’s primary
participants. We’ll use empirical data to reveal why the Commodity Index Funds have
little impact on the markets major moves as well as which trading group does
move the market and finally, who comes up with the short straw when the market
turns.

The corn futures market began the year with talk of steady
to lower prices throughout the year. We commented ourselves in early April that
this was going to be a, “Buy beans, sell corn” kind of year. Our expectations
weren’t based on rocket science. The early planting intentions called for
record acreage and the beautiful spring weather accommodated the seeding
process. These factors kept the price of corn in check between $5.50 and $6.50
per bushel. This also matched the USDA’s crop insurance price threshold of
$5.68 per bushel for the 2012 marketing year.

The corn market has two strong seasonal periods.  The first is planting time. There is
always fear that the crop won’t get in the ground and therefore, limit the
year’s crop. Small speculators and end line users of corn tend to bid up early
prices. Speculators hope that this the drought year and they finally hit a home
run while end line users hope to lock in the year’s input prices in the production
of cereals and chips. The early seasonal attempts to rally were cut short by
commercial traders hedging their crop above $6.25 while hoping to lock in trend
line yields around 160 bushels per acre. This would’ve generated about $1,000
per acre. 

The mild spring finally flushed out the small speculators as
prices made new lows for the year by the end of May, around $5.50 per bushel.
The commercial hedgers then began to cover the hedge positions they had placed
above $6.35 per bushel. This represented a cash gain of more than 12% to the
supply side commercial traders. The decline brought prices down to the low end
of the year’s forecast. At this point aggregate global demand for 2012 put a
fundamental floor under prices. 

Corn buying from commercial producers and Commodity Index
Funds took place in waves. This also represents the low point for small
speculator positions as they had been forced out of the market on the April-May
decline.

The June 12th USDA Supply and Demand Report was
the first evidence that spring’s early plantings were wilting in the heat of
May and June. The market pushed to new highs by June 26th. The rally
provided a definite shift in mentality. Traders were now in the classic,
“accumulation phase” of the market. This is characterized by rising open
interest and new highs in price. This shows that the market is welcoming new
participants who are happy to enter – even at all time high prices.

Commodity Index Fund position changes are tied very closely
to the accumulation and distribution processes of the market. Commodity Index
Funds are forced to maintain a percentage allocation stated in their prospectus.
Therefore, as the market climbs, they are forced to buy more while they are
forced to sell as the market declines. The net result is that Commodity Index
Funds will raise the floor price of a commodity as they venture into a new
market and establish their position. However, once their position is
established, their position management only affects the speed with which the
market moves, not the final prices. Thus, Commodity Index Funds may only be
guilty of increasing the volatility of a market as they add or, shed positions
accordingly. Throughout this summer, the number of contracts they’ve held has
remained within 4% of their starting point. Their value, on the other hand has
fluctuated by more than 20% as the market has rallied.

Finally, the market has stabilized between $7.75 and $8.40
per bushel. The decline in volatility over the last six weeks has brought the
retail traders back to the game. Just like clockwork, we can see that the small
traders are purchasing their contracts from the commercial traders. Commercial
traders have shed about 27% of their total position over the last month while
small speculators have increased their positions by 25.5%. This is the classic
distribution pattern as those who’ve ridden the trend take profits by selling
their positions out to the small speculators. The small speculators will be
left holding the hot potato and will be burnt at the top of this market just
like they were at the bottom in April and May.

The likely outcome is that the corn market will fall through
the support it has built up around $7.75. This will likely trigger the exit for
most small speculators. The fall may be swift as Commodity Index Funds shed
contracts to maintain their portfolio balance. Finally, the commercial traders
will be waiting as ready buyers who will now cover the short positions they’ve
initiated over the last month between $7.75 and $8.40 per bushel.

This blog is published by Andy Waldock. Andy Waldock is a trader, analyst, broker and asset manager. Therefore, Andy Waldock may have positions for himself, his family, or, his clients in any market discussed. The blog is meant for educational purposes and to develop a dialogue among those with an interest in the commodity markets. The commodity markets employ a high degree of leverage and may not be suitable for all investors. There is substantial risk of loss in investing in futures.


This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of Commodity & Derivative Advisors and is, or is in the nature of, a solicitation. This material is not a research report prepared by Commodity & Derivative Advisors’ Research Department. By accepting this communication, you agree that you are an experienced user of the futures markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, and agree that you are not, and will not, rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions.

The risk of loss in trading futures and/or options is substantial and each investor and/or trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Trading advice is based on information taken from trades and statistical services and other sources that

Commodity & Derivative Advisors believes are reliable. We do not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Trading advice reflects our good faith judgment at a specific time and is subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that the advice we give will result in profitable trades.

Leave a Reply